China could be using TikTok to spy on Australians, but is banning the answer?

TikTok is facing a lot of scrutiny around the world, with growing fears the Chinese government is using it to spy. India has recently banned it completely. But can TikTok be stopped in Australia?

Could TikTok really be a tool used by the Chinese government to spy on us?

Could TikTok really be a tool used by the Chinese government to spy on us? Source: AFP via Getty Images

In an age of isolation, video sharing platform TikTok has emerged as a bonding force for many. But recent headlines allege the service, owned by Beijing-based company ByteDance, is feeding users’ data to the Chinese Communist Party.

Earlier this week, the that an unnamed federal MP was pushing for the app to be banned.

Following suit, Liberal senator Jim Molan TikTok was being “used and abused” by the Chinese government, while Labor senator Jenny McAllister TikTok’s representatives to face the Select Committee on Foreign Interference Through Social Media.

TikTok has the accusations and rebuffed suggestions it should be banned in Australia.

But why is the federal government ? And could it really be a tool used by the Chinese government to spy on us?

A growing following

With a reported worldwide, TikTok’s is also significant. It has an estimated 1.6 million Aussie users, mostly aged 16-24 but with a growing number of .

Simply, users generate short videos that are shared in the app, with many celebrities also . But although TikTok seems to offer carefree entertainment, is there a darker side?
Australian television presenter Andrew Probyn had an unexpected TikTok moment.

What information is collected?

When installed, TikTok several permissions, including the use of the camera, microphone and contact list. However, it may also collect location data, along with information from other apps on the device.

Last year, a proposed class action TikTok in California claimed the company gathered users’ data, including phone numbers, emails, location, IP addresses, and social network contacts.

The lawsuit also stated TikTok concealed the transfer of data (including biometric data), and continued to harvest it even after the app was closed. This would mean when a user shoots a video and clicks the “next” button, the video could be automatically transferred to servers – without the user’s knowledge.

Where is the data stored?

While TikTok’s headquarters are in Beijing, Lee Hunter recently claimed Australian users’ data was stored in Singapore.

A major challenge in sorting the truth from fiction lies in how we define “data”. While TikTok users’ details and videos may be stored in Singapore, there’s still potential for data to be extracted from this video content and the device and sent to China’s servers (although this hasn’t been proven to have happened).

Hypothetically, it would then be possible for Chinese authorities to use to identify people using facial recognition. It would also be possible to map rooms and locations by using “” (a machine learning method) on videos.

This could then aid the creation of new, advanced potentially targeting specific people.

While this may seem far-fetched, there have already been preemptive TikTok bans within major organisations to ensure sensitive information isn’t leaked.

For instance, the app has been banned from devices used by the , the , and even entire countries – with the announcing a nationwide ban last month.

Privacy issues

ByteDance its data is stored in servers in the US and Singapore:
Our data centers are located entirely outside of China, and none of our data is subject to Chinese law.
TikTok’s privacy policy is ambiguous. As of January, :
You should understand that no data storage system or transmission of data over the Internet or any other public network can be guaranteed to be 100% secure.
From a user privacy perspective, TikTok has access to a device’s location and a user’s personal information. Although TikTok’s servers may be located outside China, it’s very difficult (if not impossible) to confirm where this data could end up, or what it could be used for.

While the location of servers can be important, possession of data is more relevant. Once data is obtained, it can be used. If data is stored on a server in Australia, for instance, Australian jurisdiction applies. But once it is sent to another country, that country’s laws take precedent.

And if a TikTok user decides to delete their content from their device, or if there is a government-imposed ban, data can’t be retrospectively erased. Once information is transferred, it’s impossible to retract without the cooperation of the organisation or agency concerned (in this case, TikTok).

Can the government actually ban TikTok?

The fact is, enforcing an Australia-wide ban on TikTok isn’t a simple prospect. While the federal government could request the app’s removal from the Apple App Store and Google Play Store, it could only do this for Australian regions and marketplaces.

Users in Australia would still be able to download TikTok from another region’s store, or via a third-party source. Also, banning the app from devices on which it is already installed.

Blocking access to TikTok’s servers would be done in conjunction with internet service providers (such as Telstra and Optus), as they can block access to apps and websites. But users could still use proxies or (VPNs) to circumvent these controls.

And even if TikTok was banned, citizen data already handed over would remain stored, and could be accessed for the foreseeable future.

Share
Through award winning storytelling, The Feed continues to break new ground with its compelling mix of current affairs, comedy, profiles and investigations. See Different. Know Better. Laugh Harder. Read more about The Feed
Have a story or comment? Contact Us

Through award winning storytelling, The Feed continues to break new ground with its compelling mix of current affairs, comedy, profiles and investigations. See Different. Know Better. Laugh Harder.
Watch nowOn Demand
Follow The Feed
5 min read
Published 8 July 2020 3:42pm
Updated 8 July 2020 3:57pm
By Paul Haskell-Dowland
Source: The Conversation


Share this with family and friends