The White House on Sunday appeared to play down suggestions that a controversial decision to move the US embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem was imminent.
"We are at the very beginning stages of even discussing this subject," White House press secretary Sean Spicer told AFP.
President Donald Trump had promised to move the embassy to Jerusalem "fairly quickly" after coming to office, prompting speculation that a decision could come as soon as Monday.
Like other major powers, the US has put its embassy in Tel Aviv.
Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas has warned that moving the embassy would deal a huge blow to hopes for Middle East peace.
The UN and EU have voiced deep concern over the proposal.
Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are expected to speak by phone on Sunday, White House chief of staff Reince Priebus told AFP.
Israel OKs more settler homes ahead of Trump call
Israel approved hundreds of new settler homes in east Jerusalem Sunday hours before Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke with US President Donald Trump for the first time since his inauguration.
But a potentially explosive plan to annex a large West Bank Jewish settlement unilaterally was shelved until after Netanyahu and Trump meet face-to-face.
Trump told reporters at the White House his call with Israel's premier was "very nice", without elaborating.
Earlier Netanyahu told a cabinet meeting there was plenty for the two leaders to discuss.
"There are many issues between us, including the Israeli-Palestinian issue, the situation in Syria and the Iranian threat," he said.
Related reading
Trump launches presidency with attacks on media, marchers
Trump has pledged strong support for Israel and vowed during his campaign to recognise Jerusalem as the country's capital despite the city's contested status.
Israeli right-wing politicians have welcomed his election, with hardliners who oppose a Palestinian state hoping it will allow them to move forward with their long-held goal of annexing most of the West Bank.
But the White House on Sunday appeared to play down suggestions that relocating the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem was imminent.
"We are at the very beginning stages of even discussing this subject," White House press secretary Sean Spicer told AFP.
Like other major powers, the US maintains its embassy in Tel Aviv pending a resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and Jerusalem's status.
Israel captured Arab east Jerusalem during the 1967 war and later annexed it - in a move not recognised by the international community - declaring all of the city its unified capital.
The Palestinians claim east Jerusalem as the capital of their future state.
The United States is Israel's most important ally, providing it with more than $3 billion per year in defence aid, but former president Barack Obama grew frustrated with Israeli settlement building.
He declined to veto a December 23 UN Security Council resolution condemning settlements. Trump had called for the resolution to be vetoed.
'We can finally build'
In an initial move following Trump's inauguration, Israeli officials on Sunday approved building permits for 566 settler homes in annexed east Jerusalem.
"The rules of the game have changed with Donald Trump's arrival as president," Jerusalem Deputy Mayor Meir Turjeman told AFP.
"We no longer have our hands tied as in the time of Barack Obama. Now we can finally build."
The Palestinian presidency condemned the move, calling it a violation of the UN resolution.
A draft bill to annex the Maale Adumim settlement in the occupied West Bank had been on the agenda for approval by a ministerial committee legislation on Sunday.
Such a move could badly damage prospects for a two-state solution.
Related reading
Trump begins first week in office
But the inner circle of senior ministers known as the security cabinet blocked it for the time being, a member said.
"What was decided was to wait for the meeting which will certainly take place within a few weeks," Energy Minister Yuval Steinitz told Israeli public radio.
"Then we shall have another [ministerial] debate on the matter," he said.
Annexing Maale Adumim unilaterally would set off alarm bells globally, with many warning that it would be another step towards dividing the occupied West Bank between north and south, making a contiguous Palestinian state difficult to achieve.
For some Israeli ministers who oppose a Palestinian state, that is precisely the point.
"We have to tell the American administration what we want and not wait for orders from the administration," Justice Minister Ayelet Shaked told Israel's army radio.
'Critical location'
Maale Adumim, in a strategic location east of Jerusalem, has some 37,000 residents.
Some peace proposals have envisioned it becoming part of Israel in land swaps agreed with the Palestinians, but not unilaterally.
"Given Maale Adumim's critical location in the heart of the West Bank, the international community has for years been following with special concern all developments in this area, seen as a touchstone for the viability of a two-state solution," settlements watchdog Ir Amim said.
It was unclear whether the annexation proposal would also apply to another key area called E1, located between the settlement and east Jerusalem.
Israel occupied the West Bank, like east Jerusalem, in 1967.
Settlements in both the West Bank and east Jerusalem are viewed as illegal under international law.
Some 400,000 Israeli settlers live in the West Bank, with another 200,000 in east Jerusalem. In comparison, around 2.9 million Palestinians live in the West Bank and east Jerusalem.
