KEY POINTS:
- An environmental group is challenging Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek in court.
- The group claims Ms Plibersek did not assess the impact of global warming when approving coal mines.
- The group seeks to force Ms Pilbersek to consider global warming when assessing coal mine proposals.
An environmental group has mounted a legal challenge to federal Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek after she did not accept calls to consider the impact of global warming when assessing three coal mine applications in NSW and Queensland.
The Environment Council of Central Queensland has filed a request in the Federal Court seeking a judicial review of Ms Plibersek's decisions, claiming she has refused to accept the associated with proposals.
The council claims that extending the in northeastern NSW, the Mount Pleasant open-pit mine in the Hunter Valley, and the Ensham mine in Queensland's Central Highlands would raise the risk for climate change for decades.
Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek speaks to the media during a press conference at Sea Life Sydney Aquarium, Sydney. Source: AAP / Bianca De Marchi
"The science is very clear: the burning of coal and gas is fuelling climate change, and this is causing vast and irreversible harm," she said.
The case could affect 18 coal and gas projects across Australia.
Ms Carlisle said her small environmental group did not want to take Ms Plibersek to court.
"We would much rather be doing things that we like to do ... but we are driven by our love for our living wonders and the despair that we feel at seeing the drought, floods and bushfires that are decimating them," she said.
A spokesperson for the environment minister said on Tuesday the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water had only just received documents from Environment Justice Australia.
An environmental group is taking Tanya Plibersek to court over coal mine assessments.
Ms Plibersek has previously refused to halt the planning process for proposed coalmines because the Environment Council had not proven the emissions of a specific project would be a substantial cause of climate change effects on matters of national significance.
The Environment Council was represented in court by Environmental Justice Australia, which filed two applications to the court on Friday, arguing the NSW mine expansions combined would produce 32 million tonnes of emissions a year.
