Explainer: How did Section 44 land five federal politicians in trouble over citizenship?

What law caught out senators Scott Ludlam, Larissa Waters, Matthew Canavan, Malcolm Roberts and Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce?

File: Senators Scott Ludlam, Larissa Waters, Barnaby Joyce, Matthew Canavan and Malcolm Roberts

File: Senators Scott Ludlam, Larissa Waters, Barnaby Joyce, Matthew Canavan and Malcolm Roberts Source: AAP

Section 44 of the Constitution sets out restrictions on who can be a candidate for federal parliament. Five subsections make clear what disqualifies people, but it’s article one that tripped up the two Greens, government minister Matt Canavan, One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts and Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce.

It rules out anyone with “allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power, or is a subject or a citizen or entitled to the rights or privileges of a subject or citizen of a foreign power."

“The general idea being that you need to give yourself wholeheartedly to your country and not have any mixed allegiance,” Professor Anne Twomey, a constitutional law expert at the University of Sydney, told SBS World News.
Technically, Senator Ludlam's New Zealand citizenship makes him a subject or citizen of a foreign power. Larissa Waters had a similar situation with Canada, despite both Greens leaving their countries of birth as young children. 

Barnaby Joyce is also a citizen of New Zealand, says the NZ government, and is being referred to the High Court over his dual citizenship.
Barnaby Joyce.
Barnaby Joyce. Source: AAP
Matt Canavan is not resigning from the parliament, but has stepped down from the cabinet and resigned from his ministries.

He has never been to Italy, and claims his mother signed him up when he was 25 years old without his knowledge or consent. The matter will be decided in an upcoming High Court judgement. 

Malcolm Roberts, meanwhile, has been accused of once holding British citizenship, though he claims he renounced it before he was elected. He is staying in his job until his case has been heard.

Was this situation avoidable?

All senators would have had no problem if they had renounced their citizenships of New Zealand, Canada, Britain and Italy before they ran for office.

"Before nomination, you have to take all the steps you can to renounce that foreign citizenship and that's enough," Professor Twomey said. 

Senator Ludlam was born in New Zealand and settled in Australia aged nine. He was naturalised in his mid-teens and assumed that was the end of his New Zealand citizenship. 

Crucially, however, he failed to take all reasonable steps to renounce his New Zealand citizenship - a precedent established by the Sykes versus Cleary case in 1992.
Former Greens senator Scott Ludlam has had bail conditions – that banned him from associating with Extinction Rebellion climate change protests – dismissed.
Scott Ludlam. Source: AAP

Have any other politicians been caught out by Section 44?

One Nation candidate Heather Hill was elected to the Senate in 1998, but the High Court later ruled her ineligible on the grounds she held dual citizenship of Australia and the United Kingdom.

Robert Wood was elected in 1987 to take his seat in the NSW Senate in 1988. However, his election was ruled invalid by the High Court because Mr Wood was not an Australian citizen at the time of his election.

Recently, One Nation Senator Rod Culleton was caught out by another article under Section 44. He was disqualified from the senate for being declared bankrupt - something prohibited under article three.

Have other Australian politicians been forced to renounce their citizenship?

Former prime minister Tony Abbott, who was born in London, renounced his British citizenship before becoming an MP in 1994.

Another former prime minister, Julia Gillard, who was born in Wales, renounced her citizenship before entering parliament in 1998.

Senator Derryn Hinch left New Zealand in 1963 and became an Australian citizen in 1980. He tweeted he was still required to renounce his “Kiwi status” before his political career.

Why does a multicultural nation like Australia still have this law?

Section 44 has been subject to review and debate in parliament, but nothing has come from it.

The main problem, according to Professor Twomey, is that a referendum is needed for any changes to the constitution.

“Nobody has thought that it was worth the money and effort to hold a referendum to make those changes,” she said.

What happens next?

The High Court decision in the Canavan case will set an important precedent.

It will determine whether his Italian citizenship is enough to disqualify him from the Senate. 

It will also settle whether Senator Canavan being unaware of the application is enough to absolve him. 

Despite calls for him to resign from cabinet, Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce's case is also being referred to the High Court.

Meanwhile, the two vacant Greens seats will need to be filled.

For Scott Ludlam, Professor Twomey said a recount of the 2016 WA senate vote will be required, rather than the Greens being able to choose a replacement. 

University student Jordan Steele-John, the third person on the Green’s ballot, is being touted as Senator Ludlam’s replacement.

Share
4 min read
Published 26 July 2017 11:00am
Updated 16 August 2017 1:39pm
Source: SBS World News


Share this with family and friends