'Blatantly unconstitutional': US judge blocks Trump's order to end birthright citizenship

A federal judge has temporarily blocked Donald Trump's executive order ending the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship, marking the first legal setback for the US president's hardline immigration policies.

Donald Trump holds up a signed document as the press takes photographs.

US President Donald Trump signed several executive orders at the White House on Monday — one of which moves to revoke birthright citizenship. Source: AAP / Matt Rourke

Key Points
  • A federal judge has temporarily halted Donald Trump's order to curtail automatic birthright citizenship.
  • Trump signed the executive order on his first day in office earlier this week.
  • Since Trump signed the order, at least six lawsuits have been filed challenging it.
A federal judge has blocked Donald Trump's administration from implementing the Republican president's executive order curtailing the right to automatic birthright citizenship in the United States, calling it "blatantly unconstitutional".

Seattle-based US district judge John Coughenour issued a temporary restraining order at the urging of four Democratic-led states — Washington, Arizona, Illinois and Oregon — preventing the administration from enforcing the order.

Trump had signed the order on Monday, his first day back in office.

The judge, an appointee of Republican former president Ronald Reagan, dealt the first legal setback to the hardline policies on immigration that are a centrepiece of Trump's second term as president.

Trump's executive order had directed US agencies to refuse to recognise the citizenship of children born in the US if neither their mother nor father is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident.
"I am having trouble understanding how a member of the bar could state unequivocally that this order is constitutional," the judge told a US justice department lawyer defending Trump's order on Thursday.

"It just boggles my mind."

The states argued that Trump's order violated the right enshrined in the citizenship clause of the US constitution's 14th amendment, which guarantees citizenship to anyone born in the US.

"I've been on the bench for over four decades. I can't remember another case where the question presented is as clear as this one. This is a blatantly unconstitutional order," Coughenour said of Trump's policy.

Coughenour's order, announced following a short hearing in a packed courtroom with other judges watching, prevents Trump's policy from being enforced nationwide for 14 days while the judge considers whether to issue a long-lasting preliminary injunction.

Under Trump's order, any children born in the US after 19 February whose mother and father are not American citizens or lawful permanent residents would be subject to deportation and would be prevented from obtaining social security numbers, various government benefits and the ability as they get older to work lawfully.
LISTEN TO
President Trump launches an action packed day one of his Presidency image

President Trump launches an action-packed day one of his Presidency

SBS News

22/01/202506:15
"Under this order, babies being born today don't count as US citizens," Washington state assistant attorney-general Lane Polozola, referring to Trump's policy, told the judge during a hearing in a packed courtroom.

Justice department lawyer Brett Shumate argued that Trump's action was constitutional and called any judicial order blocking it "wildly inappropriate".

But before Shumate had finished responding to Polozola's argument, Coughenour said he had signed the temporary restraining order.

The justice department plans to file papers next week to urge the judge to not issue a longer injunction, Shumate said.

The department said it had no immediate comment, and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
More than 150,000 newborn children would be denied citizenship annually if Trump's order is allowed to stand, according to the Democratic-led states.

Since Trump signed the order, at least six lawsuits have been filed challenging it, most of them by civil rights groups and Democratic attorneys general from 22 states.

Democratic state attorneys-general have said that the understanding of the constitution's citizenship clause was cemented 127 years ago when the US Supreme Court ruled that children born in the US to non-citizen parents are entitled to American citizenship.

The 14th amendment was adopted in 1868 following the US civil war and overturned the Supreme Court's notorious 1857 Dred Scott decision that had declared that the constitution's protections did not apply to enslaved Black people.

In a brief filed late on Wednesday, the justice department called the order an "integral part" of the president's efforts "to address this nation's broken immigration system and the ongoing crisis at the southern border".

Thirty-six of Trump's Republican allies in the US House of Representatives separately introduced legislation to restrict automatic citizenship to only children born to citizens or lawful permanent residents earlier this week.

Share
4 min read
Published 24 January 2025 7:01am
Source: AAP


Share this with family and friends