Key Points
- Advocates in Japan say they will continue to fight to advance the cause to legalise same-sex marriage
- Advocate group Marriage for all Japan said the ban is causing reputational harm and damaging business prospects.
Same-sex marriage advocates have described a court ruling backing a ban on legalising same-sex marriage as "very unfair", saying it does not address the "serious and sincere" concerns of the LGBTIQ+ community.
Advocate group Marriage for all Japan said the ban is causing reputational harm and damaging business prospects.
"International firms are reviewing their Asian strategy and LGBTQ inclusivity is becoming a topic," said the group's Masa Yanagisawa.
"International businesses don't want to invest in a location that isn't LGBTQ-friendly."
A Japanese court ruled the country's failure to recognise same-sex marriage is constitutional, in a setback for activists after a landmark verdict last year found the opposite.
The district court in Osaka rejected arguments made by three same-sex couples as part of a series of suits filed by activists seeking marriage equality.
"From the perspective of individual dignity, it can be said that it is necessary to realise the benefits of same-sex couples being publicly recognised through official recognition," the court ruling said.
But the present failure to recognise such unions is "not considered to violate ... the constitution", the ruling added, saying "public debate on what kind of system is appropriate for this has not been thoroughly carried out".
Akiyoshi Miwa, the lawyer representing the plaintiffs in the case, said he was "shocked" by the court's unwillingness to intervene in the debate.
"It means the judge is saying the court doesn't have to actively get involved in human rights issues," Mr Miwa said.
Plaintiff Machi Sakata - who got married to her American partner in the US state of Oregon -- said she "couldn't believe the ruling".
The court also ruled that if a framework similar to marriage was created then same-sex partners could receive legal benefits.
"Nothing can replace (marriage). I feel nothing but resentment. It's like they're saying: 'We don't treat you equally but that's OK, right?'," said Ms Sakata.
Monday's verdict comes after a district court in northern Sapporo last year found the opposite, ruling that the government's failure to allow same-sex marriage violated the constitution's provision guaranteeing equality under the law.
That ruling at the time was welcomed by campaigners as a major victory that would pile pressure on politicians to accept same-sex unions.
Japan's constitution stipulates that "marriage shall be only with the mutual consent of both sexes".
But in recent years, local authorities across the country have made moves to recognise same-sex partnerships, although such recognition does not carry the same rights as marriage under the law.
The prefecture of Tokyo last month said it would begin recognising same-sex partnerships from November, revising current rules.
More than a dozen couples filed suits seeking marriage equality in 2020 in district courts across Japan. They said the co-ordinated action was intended to put pressure on the only G7 government that does not recognise same-sex unions.
While Prime Minister Fumio Kishida has said the issue needs to be carefully considered, his ruling Liberal Democratic Party has disclosed no plans to review the matter or propose legislation, though some senior party members favour reform.
Japanese law is considered relatively liberal in some areas by Asian standards, but across the continent, only Taiwan has legalised same-sex marriage.
Additional reporting: Reuters
